Point of View

[wschac1]

I have seen what several people want to see done with the lake, and how they want to have it achieved. What I have not seen is the opposition explain why what we want done is not feasible, or not a good idea. I don't think the basis of opposition is a one line comeback, or a retorical question on what was previously posted. I would like to see the oppositions point of view on why what some say should be done, shouldn't be done, and some facts to cover their point of view. I realize that in the last couple of months this site has become a voice for Friends of Lizard Lake, and the voice of the opposition. If you are opposed to what Friends of Lizard Lake want to see done, then could you voice your opposition with a little bit of research, and facts behind what you are saying. I would also like to invite Mark Gulick to this site, and would also like to see Sean McCoy comeback to this site. What is Mark, Sean's, and the opposition's opinion and basis for their argument on not lowering the dam level? Why, or why shouldn't the water level be brought back up to it's current level, and what is the basis for their argument? All I am asking is that if you want to reply to a post, could everyone try not to post just a one liner response, or a retorical question in response to the post.

thanks,
Brian W. Schachtner